Search in ThisBlogಈಬ್ಲಾಗಲ್ಲಿ ವಿಷಯ ಹುಡುಕಿ
Wednesday, November 29, 2017
Tuesday, November 28, 2017
Monday, November 27, 2017
Saturday, November 25, 2017
Sunday, November 19, 2017
Good services appreciated
During private hospital strike,all government and atonomous hospitals served their level best. hattsoff
Saturday, November 18, 2017
Friday, November 17, 2017
Thursday, November 16, 2017
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
Monday, November 13, 2017
Saturday, November 11, 2017
Friday, November 10, 2017
Tuesday, November 7, 2017
Sunday, November 5, 2017
Supreme court orders must be followed
Read today's Deccan herald news
SC ticks off K'taka govt for holding up promotions
ASHISH TRIPATHI, NEW DELHI, DH NEWS SERVICE, NOV 5 2017, 01:35 IST
The Supreme Court ticked off the Karnataka government for holding up promotions of officers citing a review petition pending before it.
The fate of hundreds of state officers hangs in the balance after the apex court on February 9 quashed a state law providing for reservation in promotions for SC/ST employees.
A bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta described the state government's stand as "unethical".
The state government had issued a circular on March 22 directing all departments not to give effect to any promotion in view of the verdict of the apex court.
Aggrieved by the circular, a group of BBMP officers had approached the Karnataka High Court, which rejected their plea.
Setting aside the High Court's judgement of May 5, the SC on Friday (Novembe 3) directed it to have a fresh look at the plea of the officers. State government employees led by Renukamba R and others had contended that their promotions were stalled following the apex court's February 9 judgement. The HC had relied upon the state government's plea that its review petition against the February judgement was pending before the apex court.
Challenging the HC's order, petitioners' counsel Balaji Srinivasan contended that the employees who belonged to general category were on the verge of retirement.
The employees, holding different posts such as First Division Assistants (FDA), Second Division Assistants (SDA), and Health Inspectors, also challenged validity of the government circular to put all promotions on hold.
'Revise seniority'
Hearing a batch of petitions for contempt proceedings against top state officers, a separate bench had earlier on September 8 given the state government time to revise seniority list by November 30, 2017 and take further consequential action by January 15, 2018.
The court had also clarified that if any government department finalised the seniority list before such time, it can take subsequent steps ahead of the extended deadline.
The apex court had on February 9 directed revision of the seniority list of employees within three months. It also declared as unconstitutional the provisions of the 'Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservation (To the Posts in the Civil Services of the State) Act, 2002'.
It had said the consequential promotions granted to serving employees, based on seniority, would be treated as ad hoc and was liable for review